Synthetic modified mRNA (mmRNA), a new tomorrow, which never dies...
Update 12/6/2024: “Patients are waiting, families are waiting,” says Jennifer Doudna, a molecular biologist at the University of California, Berkeley. “So we need to get on with it.” in an article titled: ”Hope, despair and CRISPR — the race to save one woman’s life” at: https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-024-01716-y Doudna doesn’t seem to read VAERS reports about the deaths after the synthetic mod mRNA covid injections, something what only the most dangerous criminal on this planet, a Nobel prize scientist, can do…
Update 9/5/2022: link to the newest post of Dr. Ah Kahn Syed, about patented HUMANS and the SARS-CoV-2 Spike connection with HIV reverse transcriptase (at the very end of this post).
Urgent update 9/10/2022 : Dr. Judy Mikovits talks about lot of healthy choices for our bodies, including the covid uninjected, but suffering from sheddings, but also about 8:18 she mentions a paper, which detected the Spike production in a DEAD body 30 days after the death: https://live.childrenshealthdefense.org/shows/good-morning-chd/c10WU0PCG2
Urgent update: 9/22/2022 : Corneal Transplants are being rejected After COVID-19 injections ^6, and the same with kidneys^7, liver^8, lung^9, and that, AFTER A FORCED REQUEST of getting those injections in order to get the transplant in the first place!!!! It is DEATH BY DESIGN by the medical cartel! And it clearly indicates blood issues essential for an acceptance of any transplant. On 10/6/2022, ~2 weeks AFTER I posted the transpant issues today:https://www.wired.com/story/new-blood-types/ scientists sudden;y discover new blood types!!! No wonder the transplants DO NOT WORK ANY MORE on the covid injected!!!
Update 10/3/2022 : HIV’s gp120 and TAT proteins effect behavior and geotaxis(movements in earth gravity field) ^10. Short analysis of the SARS-CoV-2 Spike sequence in correlation with those 2 HIV proteins at the very end of this post.
UPDATE 10/6/2022: EXTREMELY IMPORTANT EXAMPLE OF HOW TO SHUT DOWN ALL covid injection centers, first in particular children centers: https://uncutnews.ch/so-gelang-es-dem-ehemaligen-polizisten-mark-sexton-und-seinem-team-ein-impfzentrum-zu-schliessen-video/
THE FREEDOM IS IN HUMAN HANDS NOW!! PLEASE ACT.
UPDATE 10/27/2022: “The real Anthony Fauci” Part II available at: https://freedomplatform.tv/the-real-anthony-fauci-the-movie/ features Dr. Melone saying ‘we do not know where these synthetic nucleotides from covid injections go, or if they are taken up by other cells…’??? Nondegradable modified mRNA building up the new human body, completely without the innate, ones human immune system??? Since both parts of this documentary by far do not tell the entire truth, for example about genetic modifications of humans caused by the injections, I do believe now, this is ‘just the begin’ of ‘public preparation’ in level of understanding how far and deep and for how long the human genocide goes.
UPDATE 12/12/2022: One of the few publications titled “N1-methylpseudouridine found within COVID-19 mRNA vaccines produces faithful protein products“ was investigating the expression of the synthetic N1-Methylpseudouridine conatining Spike gene in human HEK293 cells. Please note the deceptive, criminal actually ‘error’ in the title, like everywhere else, covid ‘vaccine’ name now used for real gene therapies! That paper also points out that reverse transcriptases from other retroviruses like Moloney murine leukemia virus or the Avian myeloblastosis virus efficiently translated the Spike SYNTEHTIC genome into its cDNA form!!!! All free to read at: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9376333/pdf/main.pdf
Update: 12/15/2022: ‘Nature’ article at https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-022-04453-2 titled “COVID spurs boom in genome sequencing for infectious diseases“ puts it right in front of human eyes, covid gene therapies via the injections, NOW based on using sequencing technology, known for MANY, many decades. Ask the first inventors Sanger and Venter, please. The consequences go much, much deeper, that’s from UK:”UK Govt To Decode DNA of 100,000 NEWBORN BABIES” to read at: https://healthnews.com/news/uk-government-announces-newborn-genomes-program-after-nyc-project-launch/
Update 12/7/2023": Dec bombshell in this newest Nature paper titled “N1-methylpseudouridylation of mRNA causes +1 ribosomal frameshifting“ available at https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-023-06800-3 . Is that all some kind of programmed cell death going on, applied worldwide on the misinformed and brainwashed humans?
The couple months old post:
gives some information connected to the global issue we have, deliberate, long planned genetic modifications of all living organisms.
In this very good article: https://expose-news.com/2022/08/21/gene-editing-tools-will-replace-biological-evolution/
there are many details about CRISP co-discoverer Jennifer Doudna’s (WEF/Bill Gates/DARPA/UC Berkeley chair in ‘Health Sciences’, with Nobel Prize in 2020 for her CRISP work, JUST on time for ‘covid response’) work and her own words, which indicate something very important:
““[Studying] the function of a protein known as CRISP/Cas9 … led to an understanding of the function of this molecule that allowed us to harness it as a tool for genetic manipulation – namely, for altering DNA sequences in any cell in a precise fashion in a programmable fashion. That gives scientists now a very powerful way to understand the function of genes but importantly also to change the function of genes in a targeted way. [timestamp 05:24]“
So first, scientists don’t understand the genes yet good enough, and despite of that, they release synthetic genetic injectible materials on billions of people??? The gene editing tool, capable of completely changing any gene, of any specie, driving the s.c. evolution, is a PROTEIN acting upon genetic material, and NOT the GENETIC MATERIAL alone, which the s.c. evolution theory puts in the center of its attention.. Proteins with genes together (thus both must have existed in THE SAME TIME), NOT THE GENES ALONE, are driving the ‘genetic path’ and give the final outcome in form of all generations of all species, which were here for ages, but now apparently everything is about to be partly ERASED, because Doudna and Co.’s CRISP discovery…? Whose intention it is to overwrite the sick humanity after the illegal covid19 gene therapy injections??
How Dr. Doudna is connected in the picture of covid19 is well illustrated at:
The 2013 book titled:”Synthetic Messenger RNA and Cell Metabolism Modulation” by the geneticist Peter M. Rabinovich from Yale School of Medicine, states in the Preface’s first sentence, quote:”Synthetic mRNA is an attractive tool for mammalian cell reprogramming that can be used in basic research as well as in clinical applications. Present mRNA in vitro synthesis is a rather simple procedure, which delivers a high yield of quality product.”
That was NINE years ago, and today is 2022!!
Just recently Alex Berenson wrote a post with a link to a japanese paper available at: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/cia2.12278
which confirms Spike production in the chronically ill patient (persistent skin lesions related to varicella zoster) for so far 88 days AFTER the Pfizer covid injection:
Since Spike is a protein which can be degraded by digestive enzymes, the question would be how about the synthetic gene with the N1-methypseudouridine, from the covid injection??? Let’s start with pseudouridine, a non-classical nucleoside present in human urine as a degradation product of RNAs. That means, human bodies excrete pseudouridine, because they can’t metabolize it further. So who/what can do it? A 2008 paper^1 states in its abstract, quote:
“we have molecularly identified two enzymes that are involved in the metabolism of pseudouridine in uropathogenic Escherichia coli, the principal agent of urinary tract infections in humans“
and also
“Data base mining indicates that most eukaryotes possess homologues of pseudouridine kinase and pseudouridine-5-phosphate glycosidase and that these are most often associated in a single bifunctional protein. The gene encoding this bifunctional protein is absent from the genomes of man and other mammals, indicating that the capacity for metabolizing pseudouridine has been lost late in evolution.“
And now addition of the methyl-group to the pseudouridine in 2020, suddenly makes the new synthetic mod mRNA degradable, according to ^2. Oh, but that only in those special cells 293FT and HeLa cells, the one which never die, maybe because of their cancer properties…??
How about Kariko and Weissman’s expertise?? Their publication ^3 shows that they monitored the degradation only for ~6 hours, after which the modified synthetic RNA was still present in their synthetic cell extracts, nevertheless they say, quote: “Ψ-modified RNAs had longer half-lives than unmodified RNAs in RRL (Figure 4A). Similarly, in HEK293T cells the half-life of Ψ-modified firefly luciferase RNA increased ~2-fold to 6.1 h compared to 3.2 h for unmodified RNA (Figure 4B). “ Yes, indeed the diagram ENDS at around the 6th hour, and there is still synthetic material there at that point, like it is in the wounds of the japanese chronic ill patient after 88 days i.e. 2112 HOURS of Pfizer injection! Clearly Kariko+Weissman didn’t have the time to wait and see, if their synthetic monsters will ever die…
The impaired wound healing involving herpes viral family is possibly connected with that one single amino acid RGD (arg-gly-asp) motif in integrin protein family, not present in any other coronaviruses, except for SARS-CoV-2. The post
goes into details of this strange fact and its possible connection to Epstein-Barr nuclear antigen leader protein (protein ID YP_401636.1 from the https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/82503188), to the synthetic biology and the research from 1989 of russian Prof. Deigin, who studied that simple peptide in regard to blood cloting, and wound healing starts with it, a sign of a healthy innate immune system response. A very good overview on wounds can be found in a paper titled: “Integrins in Wound Healing“^4. The extremely worrying fact is however, how the synthetic spike genome in the covid injected victims, repeatedly activates the herpes virus. No news like the japanese story about anyone who went through the natural infection with SARS-CoV-2. An illustration of how the RGD motif facilitates connections on the outer surface of cells:
This entire criminal scam reminds me of Monsanto claims when they introduced the synthetic GMO foods from plants with by the glyphosate inhibited EPSP enzymes. The argument was, we humans don‘t have these enzymes, only plants do, so nothing will be inhibited in human bodies by the cancer causing Roundup (contains Glyphosate=N-Phosphonomethylglycine). Well, we have gut bacteria which rely on the very same EPSP enzyme, in order to produce aromatic amino acids for us, among others lot of the neurotransmitters:
Let’s not mention the glyphosate’s feature to mimick the glycine, human inhibiting NEUROTRANSMITTER! And who/what can degrade the glyphosate made around about 300degC in chemical factories? ONLY PATHOGENIC BACTERIA.
And the government/private industry supports this action very much, the same way as it was done with the plants’ ‘old style’ GMO’s, just this time, it gets much faster and easier and is being applied now on animals (which we humans, according to ‘them’, are part of), quote from the above article:
“The grant to Accellegen is to provide small-scale dairy producers in sub-Saharan Africa access to “highly-productive and well-adapted cows.” In March, Accelligen was given FDA approval for CRISPR gene-edited beef. Based on a trial of two cows, the FDA determined no safety signals.”!!!!??
Cutting and pasting genes using restriction enzymes was known over the years ever since the DNA discovery (1953), starting extensively in the 70’es, when viral theory of origin of cancer was introduced. The result of the genetic material ‘processing’ was mixing of different species, which started with plants with embedded genes from pathogenic soil bacteria and viruses. One can imagine an analogy to that fact, taking apart an old ancient castle’s building materials (for example original soy plant) and now using it to build something different, which looks like a soy, but smells and tastes not the same way (in fact wild animals won’t touch GMO plants), most probably because of the higher levels of putrescine and cadaverine in comparison to the native, organic plants. These actions, to large degree are paid by the taxpayers money, and always supported by Bill and Melinda Gates, who are PART of the government: https://www.fda.gov/about-fda/non-profit-and-other-mous/mou-225-17-019
And while certain organizations worked on covid shots, just one ‘AI’ example: https://www.palantir.com/newsroom/press-releases/palantir-and-us-government-to-continue-work-on-covid-19-vaccine/
now the very same organization from this example (https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4250750/Peter-Thiel-s-company-Palantir-built-CIA-funding.html)
works on :
https://www.technologyreview.com/2022/09/01/1058830/next-act-antibody-cells-new-form-of-gene-therapy
with very ambitious goals, quote from MTR: ““I feel 100% confident in stating we are the first to get the green light to enter clinical trials,” says Sean Ainsworth, the CEO of Immusoft.“ describing the technology, quote “The advantage of using blood-system cells to add new genes to a person’s body is that they can be removed from a patient, engineered in the lab, and then returned to the same person through an IV drip.“
Immusoft (not microsoft..) licensed the Caltech technology and got an early investment from Peter Thiel’s biotech fund, Breakout Labs. Company founder Matthew Scholz, a software developer, boldly predicted in 2015 that a trial could start immediately.
The ‘Blood cures’ which come from software developers, supported by AI, beg one question, will that ‘programmable blood’ be patented, and so the resulting genetically modified human victims??? Is there any price which can be paid for loosing the OLD HUMANS??? Or we only pay for the new ones, while completely forgetting the past??
And the ‘gene drive’ with a long history, never stops. In 2003 a National Science Foundation (independent federal agency created by Congress in 1950), released a ~480 pages long document titled “CONVERGING TECHNOLOGIES FOR IMPROVING HUMAN PERFORMANCE“, copy of which is available at: https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/sites/default/files/microsites/ostp/bioecon-%28%23%20023SUPP%29%20NSF-NBIC.pdf
It featured a contribution by John Watson from NIH, titled “BIOMEDICINE EYES 2020“. Few quotes from it with insertions related to covid19 injections damages of human population as reported in VAERS (https://medalerts.org/vaersdb/index.php):
-”nanotechnology tools help measure and manipulate DNA and proteins; these contribute to uncovering brain physiology and cognition processes; and brain processes provide understanding of the entire system.”
=>VAERS report of all cases involving the word ‘brain’: Found 4,304 cases where Vaccine is COVID19 and Symptom is connected with the word ‘Brain’, that includes as of 8-22-22, 585 DEATHS.
- “a plan for permanent changes inside the human body, which would include new replacement organs such as cochlear implants, retinal implants, and pacemakers, as well as entirely new senses, sight, hearing, touch, taste, and smell. Imagine if we were all blind but had the other four senses. We'd design a world optimized for our sightless species, and probably do quite well.”
=> VAERS reports: 5 cases where Vaccine is COVID19 and Symptom is Cochlea implant, 2,400 cases where Vaccine is COVID19 and Symptom is ‘retinal’ issue, 20 cases with pacemakers issues, 29 cases of sight disability, 13,437 cases where Vaccine is COVID19 and Symptom is Eye-related (only for ~1/4th of the listed symptoms). search for hearing issues is giving error, so searching for ‘ear’ issues gives 6,470 cases, 3,160 cases with taste disorder, 8,954 cases where Vaccine is COVID19 and Symptom is Nasal issue. The SIGHT issues are in particular important, since it appears that now: https://expose-news.com/2022/09/16/another-ill-effect-of-covid-injections-transplant-rejection/ AFTER THE COVID INJECTIONS, WHICH ARE REQUIRED FOR GETTING TRANSPLANTS, at least in case of the corneal graft, are NO MORE WORKING, the grafts are getting rejected ( https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/11/15/4500 )!!!
- “Changes inside the body and permanent: New genes. “ and “Gene therapy is the use of recombinant DNA as a biologic substance for therapeutic purposes, using viruses and other means to modify cellular DNA and proteins for a desired purpose. “
for example for: “one approach to drug development in the future may be to test candidate formulations in populations that are genetically homogenous for certain key genetic markers^1. Still, specific research challenges remain as to the most appropriate way to catalog human genetic variation and relate the inferred genetic structure to the drug response. “
=> VAERS reports 2 cases where Vaccine is COVID-19 (COVID19) and Symptom is TP53 gene mutation, 12 cases where Vaccine is COVID19 and Symptom is Genetic counselling or Genetic polymorphism
-researchers envisioned better Memory, better imagination, downloading oneself into New Hardware, Instant Learning, Hive Mind, Speed-of-Light Travel, Self-Directed Evolution, brain representation freed from pain, hunger, lust, and pride???
=> VAERS reports 3,875 cases where Vaccine is COVID19 and Symptom is Memory impairment
- the expressed sequence tag (EST) concept. In the EST approach, a unique identifier is assigned to each eDNA in a library. Sequence tags of more than 700 nucleotides are now common, and the EST approach has been aided by formation of the IMAGE consortium, an academic-industrial partnership designed to distribute clones. The Merck Gene Index and the Cancer Genome Anatomy Project have produced many of the human clones distributed through the IMAGE consortium (http://image.llnl.gov/).
=> VAERS cancer data do not seem to reflect facts, only 42 cases where Vaccine is COVID19 and Symptom is Cancer in remission, staging, pain or surgery.
-”While selective breeding of crops, animals, and people (as in ancient Sparta) is many hundreds of generations old, only recently have gene therapies become possible as the inner working of the billion-year-old molecular tools of bacteria for slicing and splicing DNA have been harnessed by the medical and research communities.”
The link from the 2003 NSF publication to the IMAGE consortium is not accessible, but there is a french patent from 2001 describing the ESTs: “ESTs and encoded human proteins” Patent: EP 1104808-A1 06-JUN-2001; Genset (FR). The search with the program BLAST (NIH bioinformatics tool) for patented signal sequences present in the SARS-CoV-2 Spike (encoded in all the covid injections) comes up with this patent and the following sequence identities:
24.4 bits(50) 0.003 6/6(100%) 6/6(100%) 0/6(0%)
Query 57 MFVFLV 62 CAF14678.1 2001 patented Human protein
MFVFLV <<<<<Identities
Sbjct 1 MFVFLV 6 <<<<= viral SYNTHETIC Spike2020
Query 56 LMF--VFLVETGF 66
L+F V L + GF
Sbjct 821 LLFNKVTLADAGF 833
Query 8 FLFEME 13
FL ++E
Sbjct 175 FLMDLE 180
Query 47 ITGARPHARL 56
ITG RL
Sbjct 997 ITG-----RL 1001
or
Query 47 ITGARPHARLMFV 59
ITG R + +V
Sbjct 997 ITG-RLQSLQTYV 1008
Query 45 AG-IT 48
AG IT
Sbjct 879 AGTIT 883The amino acid sequence of the CAF14678.1 human protein, available at: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/protein/CAF14678.1 is rather short:
ORIGIN 1 myqmtffflf emescsvaqa gvilaycnlr lpgssdshas asrvagitga rpharlmfvf 61 lvetgf
Thus the amount of homologous sections for this short protein is rather high, but still, one can see more, done by hand, in particular for the CAF14678.1 first 20 residues representing the so called signal peptide:
Query 1 MYQMTFFFLFEME 13 CAF14678.1 patented Human protein
M QM++ F <<< IDENTITIES
Sbjct M-QMAYRFNGIGV <<< Spike 2020
Query 1 MY-QMTFFFLFEMESC-SVAQA 20 << CAF14678.1
M M L M SC S+ +
Sbjct MVTIM----LCCMTSCCSCLKG << Spike 2020 This post is not finished yet, it will be updated with newer and older information, when it flows in, including the contents of the patents mentioned in ^4, with the for quite a while intended content touching the “Opto-Genetic Engineering and Archons.“ Any comments are very welcome, in particular if you know how to degrade the N1-Methyl-pseudouridine, which will end with changing the title of this post..
The PATENT issue coming along with the covid synthetic mRNA injections was raised by many, the most recent one, by Dr. AK Syed:
https://principia-scientific.com/moderna-may-claim-ownership-of-those-children-who-received-its-covid-vaccine/
In support of this, a reminder about the paper early 2020 titled “Uncanny similarity of unique inserts in the 2019-nCoV spike protein to HIV-1 gp120 and Gag“ which was retracted very quickly but nevertheless, until this day has a pretty real consequences in terms of connections to longlasting immunological issues after the never ending covid injections. That paper identified 4 very short HIV-1 amino acid ‘inserts’ in the Spike2020 (from SARS-CoV2) : GTNGTKR, YYHKNNKS, GDSSS, and the gag protein the ‘QTNSPRRA’, with the latter being part of the furin cleavage side. In that retracted paper there was no mention about the furin side short sequence homolog withing the HIV spike too: ‘PRRIRQG‘. A bioinformatics BLAST output comparing The SARS-CoV-2 Spike protein with different HIV-1 POLy-protein, which also encodes the HIV-1 reverse transcriptase (ncbi code NP_789740.1) gives equally disturbing result, LOT of identities and homologies, for example, the very same furin site:
18.1 bits(35) 4.2 7/12(58%) 9/12(75%) 0/12(0%)
Query 9 SSEQTRANSPTR 20 HIV-1 POL (reverse transcriptase)
+S QT NSP R <<<<Identities
Sbjct 672 ASYQTQTNSPRR 683 <<<Spike2020
Query 221 LVDFRELNKRTQDF---WEVQLGIPHPAGLKKKKSVTVL 256 HIV-RT
L+D +EL K Q W + LG AGL VT++
Sbjct 1197 LIDLQELGKYEQYIKWPWYIWLGFI--AGLIAIVMVTIM 1233 Spike
Query 900 GYSAGERIVDI-IATDI---QT 917
G+SA E +VD+ I+++I QT
Sbjct 219 GFSALEPLVDLPIGINITRFQT 240
Query 400 TVNDIQKLVGKLN 412 HIV-1(Reverse Transcriptase RT)
+V +IQK + +LN <<<IDENTITIES
Sbjct 1175 SVVNIQKEIDRLN 1187 <<SPIKE2020
Query 520 QKITTESIVIWG 531
Q ITT+++ + G
Sbjct 1113 QIITTDNTFVSG 1124
Query 463 GVYYDPSK 470 HIV-1 (RT domain)
GVYY P K <<<IDENTITIES
Sbjct 35 GVYY-PDK 41 SPIKE2020
Query 275 TAFTIPSINNETPGIRYQYNVLPQGWKGSPAIFQSSMTK 313(HIV RT)
T FTI S+ E +LP SMTK
Sbjct 716 TNFTI-SVTTE---------ILP-----------VSMTK 733 Spike
Query 185 CT-E-------MEKEGK 193 HIV-1 RT
CT E M+ EGK
Sbjct 166 CTFEYVSQPFLMDLEGK 182 Spike2020
Query 301 KGSPAIFQSS 310
KG I+Q S
Sbjct 310 KG---IYQTS 316
Query 86 LPGRWKP-K--MIGGI---------GGFIKVRQY-DQIL-IE----ICGHKAIG-TVL 124 HIV-1 POL
LP KP K +I + +GFIK QY D + I IC++K G TVL <<< IDENTITIES
Sbjct 806 LPDPSKPSKRSFIEDLLFNKVTLADAGFIK--QYGDCLGDIAARDLICAQKFNGLTVL 861 SPIKE2020
Query 97 GIGGFIKVRQ---YD-QILI 112
GIG V Q Y+ Q LI
Sbjct 908 GIG----VTQNVLYENQKLI 923Taking just the HIV-1 reverse transcriptase alone, a 560 amino acid long protein. with a domain which converts the single-stranded RNA into double-stranded viral DNA for integration into host chromosomes, while searching for shorter fragments one finds ~50% of sequence coverage with 100% identities. In addition to the above common segments from the POL protein, here more homolog sections between the SPike and HIV-1 reverse transcriptase:
18.5 bits(36) 1.9 5/5(100%) 5/5(100%) 0/5(0%)
Query 377 TESIV 381 HIV-1 Reverse Transcriptase (RT)
TESIV IDENTITIES
Sbjct 323 TESIV 327 Spike2020
Query 26 LTEEKI 31
LT+E I
Sbjct 865 LTDEMI 870
Query 377 TESIVIWGKTPKFKLPIQ 394
TES K KF LP Q
Sbjct 553 TES----NK--KF-LPFQ 563
Query 320 DPSK--------DL 325 HIV-1 RT
DPSK DL
Sbjct 808 DPSKPSKRSFIEDL 821 SPIEK2020
part of the above fragment is extremely important mentioned in previous posts
Query 22 KQWPLTEEKIKALVEICTE--------MEKEGK 46
K W +E ++ + CT M+ EGK
Sbjct 150 KSWMESEFRVYSSANNCTFEYVSQPFLMDLEGK 182
Query 547 QVDKLV 552
Q+D+L+
Sbjct 992 QIDRLI 997
Query 154 KGSPAIFQSS 163
KG I+Q+S
Sbjct 310 KG---IYQTS 316
Query 119 PLDEDFRKYT--AFTIPSINNETPGIRYQ 145
PL E K T FT+ E GI YQ
Sbjct 295 PLSET--KCTLKSFTV-----EK-GI-YQ 314
Query 477 TELQAIYLA 485
TE IY A
Sbjct 470 TE---IYQA 475
Query 469 LTDTTNQKTELQA 481
L D NQ QA
Sbjct 948 LQDVVNQNA--QA 958
Query 74 LVDFREL 80
LV R+L
Sbjct 212 LV--RDL 216
Query 375 ITTESIVIW--GKTP 387
I TE I+ G TP
Sbjct 468 ISTE---IYQAGSTP 479
Query 293 IPLTeeaelelaeNREILKEPV 314
IP T EIL PV
Sbjct 714 IP-TNFTISVTT---EIL--PV 729
Query 166 KILEPF----RKQNPDI 178
K L PF R DI
Sbjct 558 KFL-PFQQFGR----DI 569and many more fragments. It is interesting that no matter which parameters one chooses in BLAST search, the sections rich with aromatic amino acids (W,Y,F, the one which usually intercalate/bind with equally aromatic rings within the DNA/RNA via so called pi-stacking) one only gets these few sections:
18.1 bits(35) 2.3 14/39(36%) 19/39(48%) 5/39(12%)
Query 74 LVDFRELNKRTQDF---WEVQLGIPHPAGLKKKKSVTVL 109
L+D +EL K Q W + LG AGL VT++
Sbjct 1197 LIDLQELGKYEQYIKWPWYIWLGFI--AGLIAIVMVTIM 1233
Query 219 KKHQKEPPFLWMGY 232
+ K P ++W+G+
Sbjct 1207 EQYIKWPWYIWLGF 1220
Query 57 NTPVFAI-KKKDSTKW 71
N P + K++ W
Sbjct 137 NDPFLGVYYHKNNKSW 152
Query 337 WTY------QIYQEPF 346
WT+ QI PF
Sbjct 886 WTFGAGAALQI---PF 898
Query 227 FLWMGY 232
++W+G+
Sbjct 1215 YIWLGF 1220
but not for example this one, done by hand, with shifts:
lpiqk-etwetw-wtey-wqatwipewef-vntp <<=HIV REVERSE TRANSCRIPTASE
+ K E + W W Y W + +I V
qelgkyeqyikwpw--yiwlg-fiagliaivmv <<SARS-CoV-2 Spike
or even completely without
lpiqketwetwwteywqatwipewefvntp
qelgkyeqyikwpwyiwlgfiagliaivmvTo assume that these strings of amino acids are completely random, given that all of it is patented, must be quite a special random algorithm…
What is important, that the by the indian researchers identified similarities with HIV-1 spike and SARS-CoV-2 spike, and the HIV-1 gag and the SARS SPike go possibly back into the somewhat ‘common core’ shared with ALL reverse transcriptases of the viral spikes. The question would be, if the spike itself is possibly some kind of RT chimera, is it a vicious cycle initiated by the injected spike genomes, which then help to incorporate the translated cDNA into the human chromosomes, while reading their own mRNA signals??? Well, this last section is a huge speculation, except for the BLAST results, which are clear and can be verified by anyone… One should ask Fauci, he is the expert on HIV! His AZT HIV drug, which ruined lives of so many, binds exactly the reverse transcriptase around the spots where the nucleotides bind and the comparisons between those in HIV RT and Spike 2020 are:
*<<nucleotide binding in RT
Query 171 FRKQN--P---DIVIYQYMDDLY 188 HIV-1 RT
FRK N P DI + Y
Sbjct 456 FRKSNLKPFERDIST-----EIY 473 Spike 2020
*****<< nucleotide binding in RT
Query 111 VGDAY 115 HIV RT
V + Y
Sbjct 656 VNNSY 660 Spike 2020
for the last section of nucleotides binding site in HIV RT there are 2 homolog section withing SPike2020:
*<<nucleotide residue binding
Query 147 NVLPQ 151 HIV RT
N L Q
Sbjct 751 NLLLQ 755 Spike 2020
and
*<< nucleotide binding
Query 128 TAFTIPSINNETPGIRYQYNVLPQGWKGSPAIFQSSMTK 166 HIV RT
T FTI S+ E +LP SMTK
Sbjct 716 TNFTI-SVTTE---------ILP-----------VSMTK 733 SpikeThis is usually an important part in drugs analysis, looking at the CONSERVATION of the single amino acids which bind nucleotides, DNA/RNA, etc. The NCBI entry for that part is defined there as:
Site order(110..115,151,185)
/site_type="other"
/note="NTP binding site [chemical binding]"
/db_xref="CDD:238823"The above conclusion is not surprising, given that:
difference between RNA and DNA single building blocks is not big ( see
for more details), that feature is necessary during the assembly of their chains. Their final 3D folding is very different though.
The SARS-CoV-2 RNA-dependent RNA polymerase(RdRp) is almost entirely covered in terms of sequence coverage with the Spike protein and the similarities and identities between the 2 sequences are ~36% (which includes the furin site) and which is not small value. On the other hand, the homologies between the HIV reverse transcriptase (560 amino acids, aa) and SARS-CoV-2 RdRp protein (932 aa), multiplying the genetic RNA material, share equally not a small ~31% of identities in large segments.
RNA/DNA replication mechanism, although encoded by different proteins deals with consecutive attachment of the very similar building blocks.
A recent post by ‘bird’
puts together a good collection of articles and thoughts summarizing HIV-1 TAT peptides and their physiological consequences. Although SARS-CoV-2 SPike does show homology with TAT, the strongly positively charged fragment TAT-peptide47-57 (GRKKRRQRRRP) is not in the Spike sequence, except for the furin side (PRRARS) which only contains 3 arginines, not double the amount with more positively charged lysines. What’s in SPike from HIV-TAT (called gp5, NIH code NP_057853.1 ) is the following, according to BLAST:
19.2 bits(38) 0.082 8/18(44%) 9/18(50%) 2/18(11%)
Query 20 TACTNCYCKKCCFHCQVC 37 <<=HIV-1 TAT, gp5
T+C C C K C C C
Sbjct 1238 TSC--CSCLKGCCSCGSC 1253 <<=SARS-CoV-2 Spike
Query 63 QTHQASLSKQPTSQPR 78 <<=HIV TAT
QT+ T PR
Sbjct 675 QTQ--------TNSPR 682 <<=begin of furin site, Spike2020
Query 23 TNCYCKKCCFH-CQVCFITKALGISYGRKKR 52 HIV TAT
TN K C F C F LG+ Y + +
Sbjct 124 TNVVIKVCEFQFCNDPF----LGVYYHKNNK 150 SLpike2020
the second above alignemt showing only part of the furin site could be actually expanded and shifted, without any internal shifts:
CFITKALGISYGRKKRRQRRRAHQNSQTHQASLSKQPTSQP << HIV-TAT
+ A + RR R A Q + SL +
GAGICASYQTQTNSPRRARSVASQSIIAYTMSLGAENSVAY <<Spike 2020
or possibly like this with shifts
CFITKALGI-SY-GRKKRRQRRRAHQNSQTHQA-SLSKQPTSQP
C + + + +R+ R A Q S + + SL + +
C--ASYQ-TQTNSPRRARS---VASQ-SIIAYTMSLGAENSVAYThe 2008 research (publication^8) showed that neonatal exposure to HIV-1 proteins gp120 and TAT may cause adulthood spatial memory alterations in the 5 hippocampal subregions. Is it possible that the spacial learning and memory, influencing behavior, would also be affected by the SARS-CoV-2 Spike, injected into billions??? Who knows, but just looking at:
https://forbiddenknowledgetv.net/deadly-covid-vaccines-and-the-mysterious-downward-spiral/
one can imagine, everything is possible. And going back to the post:
one can almost imagine a completely crazy conspiracy thought, maybe somebody is afraid of us realizing that we are not on a spinning ball while trying to mess up our GEOSPACIAL senses?
Literature:
“Molecular Identification of Pseudouridine-metabolizing Enzymes“. THE JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY VOL. 283, NO. 37, pp. 25238 –25246, September 12, 2008
“N 1-Methylpseudouridine substitution enhances the performance of synthetic mRNA switches in cells“ Nucleic Acids Res. 2020 Apr 6; 48(6): e35.
Published online 2020 Feb 24. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkaa070
“Nucleoside modifications in RNA limit activation of 2′-5′-oligoadenylate synthetase and increase resistance to cleavage by RNase L“ https://academic.oup.com/nar/article/39/21/9329/1093548
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4250945/pdf/wound.2013.0436.pdf
multiple patents:
https://www.freepatentsonline.com/y2019/0004032.html https://patents.google.com/patent/KR20170090373A/en
https://patents.google.com/patent/US6506148B2/en
articles:
“Brain-Computer Interface Controlled Cyborg: Establishing a Functional Information Transfer Pathway from Human Brain to Cockroach Brain“ at https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0150667&type=printable
“ULTRASOUND FOR THE BRAIN“ at https://mastersonics.com/documents/mmm_applications/MASSAGER/ULTRASOUND-Brain.pdf
Amar P Shah et al. “Acute Corneal Transplant Rejection After COVID-19 Vaccination“ Cornea 2022 Jan 1;41(1):121-124. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34620770/
Arnaud Del Bello et al. “Acute rejection after anti-SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccination in a patient who underwent a kidney transplant“ Kidney Int 2021 Jul;100(1):238-239 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33932459/
Raiya Sarwar et al. “Acute cellular rejection in liver transplantation recipients following vaccination against coronavirus disease 2019: A case series.” Liver Transpl. 2022 Aug;28(8):1388-1392.
S. Alsunaid et al. “COVID-19 Vaccine Triggered Rejection in Lung Transplant Recipients: A Case Series“ The Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation
Volume 41, Issue 4, Supplement, April 2022, Page S533 https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1053249822013705
Sylvia Fitting et al. “Neonatal intrahippocampal injection of the HIV-1 proteins gp120 and Tat: Differential effects on behavior and the relationship to stereological hippocampal measures”. Brain Res. 2008 September 26; 1232: 139–154.
demonic experimentation
Wow at that Korean mind control patent. Great find. Do you relate that to the Covid jabs overarching scheme or some other nefarious agenda? Also one of my lawyer friends turned me onto lens.org for free patent 🔎 and I love it especially for the family + associated patents.