Covid19 Spike, its antibodies and Monsanto patents. Prof. A. Burkhardt's pathological findings of the covid injected deceased victims.
Updates history:
10-2-2022: Prof. Burkhart is continuing pathological investigations of the deceased after the covid injections and describes his newest findings in interview titled “Pathologist Arne Burkhardt´s findings in autopsies and biopsies of people vaccinated against Covid-19 Sarscov-2“:
https://www.brighteon.com/3040ff03-1113-46db-b70b-962a55949145
6-8th-2022: Prof Burkhard’s answer to CRIMINAL ‘scientific’ accusations by other scientists: https://uncutnews.ch/prof-dr-arne-burkhardt-zu-den-vorwuerfen-der-unwissenschaftlichkeit-von-frontal-correctiv-und-co/
questioning his pathology results on the bodies of the deceased AFTER the covid gene modification injections. Just wonder, WHO is paying for this ???
6-13-2022 Significant expansion of results on Monsanto PATENTED GMO proteins and the Spike genome from covid GENE THERAPY INJECTIONS (at the end)
The Spike protein of SARS-CoV-2 virus was and will stay the major issue related to the covid injection materials which include pure 100% synthetic genetic material and among few, also undisclosed ingredients. The Spike outer viral surface glycoprotein initiates the infection, thus being declared the enemy no 1, so the science sets for a production of antibodies to it, while deciding to inject the GENETIC CODE FOR IT DIRECTLY INTO HUMAN ARMS (possibly lymph nodes and blood too). Non only that, the ‘method’ became MANDATORY for many, just in order to feed the family, it extended into every aspect of human life, specifically among young people, including CHILDREN!!!! As of Sep 2022, FDA still withholds essential information about deceased after covid19 injections: https://www.extremelyamerican.com/post/fda-withholding-autopsy-results-on-people-who-died-after-getting-covid-19-vaccines
In the meantime other countries, like Germany work on it, with more slides and explanations at:
Our human bodies need an antibody to it, so far so good, but now the decision to make all human bodies to produce that Spike inside of their bodies from their own human ingredients, not only sounds insane, it literally is insane. That’s not delivery of the antibody that’s production of the toxin itself, that’s BECOMING THE TOXIN! The scientific fraud goes much deeper here. Prof. S. Bhakdi reminds ALL SCIENTISTS that the antibody production and their subsequent circulation happens ONLY IN BLOOD: https://uncutnews.ch/prof-bhakdi-es-steht-etwas-bevor-was-die-menschheit-gefaehrden-wird/
So how on earth a virus coming out of all these infected victims (I suspect only AFTER the covid19 injections or exposure to those who got them) can ever meet any antibody on the epithelial cells of nose, eyes, throat, bronchi, etc, when the synthetically manufactured antibodies (sequences of which are btw. NOT AVAILABLE…) are residing and floating in the BLOOD???? The virus would need to go directly into blood in order to become dis-activated… Acording to Prof. Bhakdi, antibodies production DOES NOT PROTECT from any viral infections, a clear proof of which we see in all the s.c. breakthrough infections of the covid19 injected.
The modified synthetic mRNA is fooling the human body to be a part of it, mimicking a presence of a gene, which is not even physically there, but alone via the messenger (that’s why messenger RNA) is producing synthetic completely new PROTEIN sequence with horrendous PATENTED ingredients, mixing up all different species, whereby the Spike genome just recently was proven to become in vitro a part of the human genome^1! One of the most important papers from Oct 2020 was Moderna+NIAID+R. Barics’ et al. work^2, saying that the Spike (carrying ACE2 receptor binding domain!) from the just tested ModERNA injections mRNA-1273, can be expressed on the surface of the cells HEK293T cells and via that exposure induce an immune response. That was the biggest lie in that work. There is no ribosome on this planet which will translate a protein directly onto a lipid surface! Ribosome is a 3D structure composed of countless proteins and RNA, it can work only if its free ‘floating’ inside of the cell or on the ER, still inside of the cells cytoplasm. A translated amino acid string of a new protein has to be folded first, in order to have any function. This is accompanied by protein family called chaperones. Then each protein undergoes the so called post-translational modifications on order to finally be ready to perform any of its final functions. The translation is process performed entirely inside of the cytoplasm of every cell. Only proteins with specific ‘signals’ get through cell membrane or get embedded into it. Thus to say “spike is expressed on the cell surface’ is not true, totally incorrect.
That’s why Prof. Burkhard is detecting tons of Spike proteins in the injected deceased bodies in almost all tissues, all over. The majority of all blood capillaries contain never ever seen by any radiologist a ‘double wall second capillary’ inside of the capillaries volume. His testimony (in german) about his findings, including confirmation of the american embalmers (pulling the strange tissues out of veins of the deceased victims) can be seen here:
https://report24.news/pathologie-konferenz-prof-burkhardt-referiert-im-saechsischen-landtag/
and the most recent (3/18/2022 update) from ACU2020 hearings by Dr. Fuellmich, is available here:
http://www.opensourcetruth.com/pathology-of-vaccine-deaths-and-vaccine-injuries-after-the-evidence-now-first-proof/
and also again in German, but in extended version, here:
https://odysee.com/@Corona-Ausschuss:3/Arne-Burkhardt-Sitzung-95:5
Multiple articles claim a confirmation of NIAID+Barics’ work of 63 authors(!), for example ^3, while denouncing any link of the post Covid19 ‘vaccination’ thrombosis’ to ACE2 pathways, quote: “One of the key features is that the spike protein produced by the mRNA vaccines are trans-membrane anchored and not released into the circulation like in active SARS-CoV-2 infection and hence does not have the potential to interact with systemic endothelial cells.“ Once the foreign, synthetic Spike is on any CELL’s SURFACE, facing OUTSIDE, that cell mimics a ‘virus’, targeted for a destruction.
So what on earth Prof. Burkard is seeing? The ribosomes are 3D complex structures never bound to any surface, except for ER, still inside of every cell and never releasing their translated proteins (also 3D objects after the folding) on a surface! Once again, once out of ribosome any protein needs to be properly FOLDED into a 3D object, thus to say ‘Spike expression on a surface’ is a physical IMPOSSIBILITY, and thus a LIE. Spike can get anchored into the cell membrane via its signalling motifs, and that’s a different story. Before getting to any surface the Spike will do what it was designed for, bind the human ACE2 via its RBD domain, and that is going to make part of the huge damage, seen inside of the organs after the histological immunostaining. The RBD domain of the Spike has the following amino acid sequence: “LFRKSNLKPFERDISTEIYQAGSTPCNGVEGFNCYFPLQSYGFQPTNGVGY“
pieces of which were patented way before 2020. In Ralph Baric's patent from 2018 for: “Methods and compositions for chimeric coronavirus spike proteins.” US 9884895-B2. the entire above 2020 RBD sequence was 38% IDENTICAL with Baric's 'art'. Here the alignment:
Query 2 FRKSNLKPFERDISTEIYQAGSTPCNGVEGFNCYFPLQSYGFQPTNGVGY 51 injected Spike
_______+RK LKPFERD+S++_____________NGV____ + L +Y F P+ V Y ___________Identities
Sbjct 442 YRKEKLKPFERDLSSDE--------___NGV------YTLSTYDFYPSIPVEY 477 from 2018 Baric's Patent
38% identity in amino acid sequence that's in a 'drug world' a substantial similarity.
2005 patent by Taiwanese gov US 7491397-A with the tile "Receptor binding polypeptides " aligns with the first portion of the the 2020 RBD domain in Spike:
Query 2 FRKSNLKPFERDISTEIYQAGSTPC 26 —>injected SPike
_________R L+PFERDIS + PC
Sbjct 10 LRHGKLRPFERDISNVPFSPDGKPC 34 —>2005 patent
and the homolog to the second RBD part, split at the Pro-Cys (PC) was patented by Monsanto:
Query 32 FNCYFPLQSYGFQPTNGVGY 51 —→injected Spike
_________FN YF LQ+ +QP +G GY ————>IDENTITIES
Sbjct 228 FNAYFALQNSKYQPISGKGY 247 ——>GMO PLANTS
in 2008 filed patent US 8067671-B2 for "Methods for genetic control of plant pest infestation and compositions thereof". When taking the entire Monsanto patented 'plant' construct one gets BLAST result showing >50% of identities for the ~500aa large GMO plant protein with the entire Spike (BLAST needs to be run with customized parameters targeting the smaller peptides) ! The Monsanto’s patent description:
“ The present invention is directed to controlling plant pest infestation by inhibiting one or more biological functions in the plant pest. The invention discloses methods and compositions for use in controlling plant pest infestation by providing one or more different recombinant double stranded RNA molecules in the diet of the pest in order to achieve a reduction in pest infestation through suppression of pest gene expression. The invention is also directed to methods for making transgenic plants that express the double stranded RNA molecules, to methods for detecting cells comprising the disclosed sequences, and to methods for detecting the disclosed sequences in biological samples."
Please note, plants are eukaryotes, like we, humans! All these posts are thanks to Steve Kirsch, who made this platform possible! THANK YOU STEVE!
1. Markus Aldén et al. “Intracellular Reverse Transcription of Pfizer BioNTech COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine BNT162b2 In Vitro in Human Liver Cell Line.” Curr. Issues Mol. Biol. 2022, 44, 1115–1126
2.Kizzmekia S. Corbett et al. “SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccine design enabled by prototype pathogen preparedness.” Nature. 2020;586:567–571.
3.R. Dalana and B. O. Boehmb “Thrombosis post COVID-19 vaccinations: Potential link to ACE pathways“ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8397505/
Starting from the amino acid sequence of the 2 in PDB data bank deposited CP4 EPSP synthases, genetically modified to bind glyphosate, and searching for PATENTED homolog structures, the very first hit comes for some of the MONSANTO patents:
-Compositions and methods for deploying a transgenic refuge seed blend US 9365863-B2 17 14-JUN-2016
-1997 ‘Glyphosate-tolerant 5-enolpyruvylshikimate-3-phosphate synthases’ Patent: US 5627061-A 3 06-MAY-1997
-Antibody immunoreactive with a 5-enolpyruvylshikimate-3-phosphate synthase Patent: US 7183110-A 70 27-FEB-2007
Here just few of the customized NIH BLAST outputs showing the similarities between the SPike genome and the MONSANTO original ‘97 glyphosate tolerant EPSP:
Query 353 KESDRLSAVANGLKLNGVDCDE-GETSLVVRGRPDGKGLG EPSP-GMO
KE DRL+ VA L + +D E G+ ++ P LG
Sbjct 1181 KEIDRLNEVAKNLNESLIDLQELGKYEQYIKW-PWYIWLG Spike2020
Query 192 TVIEPIMTRD----HTEKMLQG 209 EPSP-GMO
TV+ P++T + +T +L G
Sbjct 859 TVLPPLLTDEMIAQYTSALLAG 880 SPIKE 2020
Query 337 FAEGATVMNGLE 348 EPSPS-GMO
+ G+T NG+E
Sbjct 473 YQAGSTPCNGVE 484 Spike2020
Query 153 PVTLRGPKTPT 163
P T+ GPK T
Sbjct 521 PATVCGPKKST 531
Query 211 GANLTVETDADGVRTIRLEGRGKLTGQVIDVPGDPSS 247 EPSP-GMO
G N+T +T+ R LT PGD SS
Sbjct 232 GINIT------RFQTLLALHRSYLT------PGDSSS 256 Spike
And now some examples of homologies between the Antibody immunoreactive with a 5-enolpyruvylshikimate-3-phosphate synthase, oh boy, all looks the same, so here few more:
Query 418 ENPVT-VDDATMIATS 432 EPSP-GMO
+NPV +D A++
Sbjct 80 DNPVLPFNDGVYFAST 95 Spike2020
Query 387 GKGLGNASGAAVATH 401
GKG S A H
Sbjct 1044 GKGYHLMSFPQSAPH 1058
Query 363 NGLKLNGV 370
NGL GV
Sbjct 544 NGLTGTGV 551
Query 367 LNGVDCDEGETSLVVRGRPDGKGLG 391
NGV+ L G G+G
Sbjct 480 CNGVEGFNCYFPLQSYGFQPTNGVG 504
going into shorter peptides representing usually epitopes one gets >80% sequence coverage and among those 61% of IDENTITIES between the Spike and the MONSANTO patent, here more of those:
Query 242 PGDPSS--TA 249 EPSP-GMO
PGD SS TA
Sbjct 251 PGDSSSGWTA 260 SPIKE2020
Query 174 AQVKSAVLLAGLNTPG 189 EPSPS-GMO
AQ SA LLAG T G
Sbjct 871 AQYTSA-LLAGTITSG 885 Spike2020
Query 165 ITYRVPMASAQVK 177 EPSP-GMO
+TY VP AQ K
Sbjct 1065 VTY-VP---AQEK 1073 Spike2020
Query 1 MLHGASSRPATA---RKSSGLSGTVRIPGDKSISHRSFMFGGLASGETRITGLL 51
+LH PAT KS L V +K + F F GL TG L
Sbjct 517 LLHA----PATVCGPKKSTNL---VK---NKCVN---FNFNGLTG-----TGVL 552
Query 196 PI-MTRDHTEKML-QGFGA-----------NLT 215
PI + RD L QGF A N T
Sbjct 209 PINLVRD-----LPQGFSALEPLVDLPIGINIT 236
Query 147 EDGDRLPVTLRGPK 160
ED D PV L G K
Sbjct 1258 ED-DSEPV-LKGVK 1269
Query 62 AMQAMGARIRKEGDTWIIDGVG 83
AMQ M R +G+G
Sbjct 899 AMQ-MAYRF---------NGIG 910
Query 246 SSTAFPLVAALLVPGS--DV 263
SSTA AL G DV
Sbjct 939 SSTA----SAL---GKLQDV 951
Query 299 ED----VADLRVRSSTLKGV 314
ED V LKGV
Sbjct 1258 EDDSEPV---------LKGV 1268
Query 165 ITYRVPMASAQVK 177
+TY VP AQ K
Sbjct 1065 VTY-VP---AQEK 1073
The MONSANTO patented sequences are parts of the plants we eat, thus it is really interesting to see so many sequence homologies between the viral Spike protein and the synthetically developed new biological parts of GMO plants which are in fact chimera’s between edible crop plant+pathogenic virus+pathogenic bacteria.
Taking the MONSANTO patented sequence and searching for similar proteins from the SNAKE kingdom, there is only one hit, for german patent related to cobra venom factor:
TITLE Complement depletion using recombinant human c3-derivatives JOURNAL Patent: WO 2005003159-A1 13-JAN-2005;
and here are the similarities:
21.2 bits(43) 1.0 Composition-based stats. 13/26(50%) 15/26(57%) 2/26(7%)
Query 249 AFPLVAALLV--PGSDVTILNVLMNP 272
A LVAALL+ PGS L L+ P
Sbjct 5 ALYLVAALLIGFPGSSHGALYTLITP 30
Query 374 EGETSLVVRGRPDGKGLGNASGAAVATHL 402
E ET ++++G P + + N+ + HL
Sbjct 958 EIETKIIIQGDPVAQIIENSIDGSKLNHL 986
Query 155 TLRGPKTP-TPITYRV 169
T +G TP +P+ YRV
Sbjct 132 TDKGIYTPGSPVLYRV 147
Query 232 GKLTGQVIDVPGDPSSTAFPLVAAL 256
G + G + + TAF LVA L
Sbjct 1111 GTMQGGIQGAEEEVYLTAFILVALL 1135
What is the human C3? According to uniprot: Adipogenic hormone that stimulates triglyceride (TG) synthesis and glucose transport in adipocytes, regulating fat storage and playing a role in postprandial TG clearance. Appears to stimulate TG synthesis via activation of the PLC, MAPK and AKT signaling pathways.^7
How many pieces of the complement factor C3 are in the Spike?? Of course there is a huge amount, for example:
24.4 bits(50) 0.10 Compositional matrix adjust. 20/62(32%) 25/62(40%) 6/62(9%)
Query 974 TESETRIL-LQ--GTPVAQMTEDAVDAERLKHLIVTP HUMAN C3
TES L Q G +A T+ D + L L +TP
Sbjct 553 TESNKKFLPFQQFGRDIADTTDAVRDPQTLEILDITP Spike
Query 1501 KLNKLCRDELCRCAEENCFIQKSD
KLN LC + F+ D
Sbjct 386 KLNDLCFTNVY----ADSFVIRGD
Query 798 SITTWEILAVSMSDKKGIC 816
S+TT EIL VSM C
Sbjct 721 SVTT-EILPVSMTKTSVDC 738
there are sections with HUNDREDS of amino acids carrying signature patterns, for example:
16.8 bits(32) 20 Compositional matrix adjust. 58/239(24%) 68/239(28%) 32/239(13%)
Query 331 ILHSGSDMVQAERSGIPIVTSPYQIH--FTKTPKYF-KPGMPFDLMVFVTNPDGSPAYRV 387
+LHS D+ VT IH T K F P +PF+ V+ + S R
Sbjct 47 VLHSTQDLFLP---FFSNVTWFHAIHVSGTNGTKRFDNPVLPFNDGVYFASTEKSNIIRG 103
Query 388 PVAVQGEDT-VQSLTQGDGVAKLSINTHPSQ----KPLSITVRTKKQELSEAEQATRTMQ 442
+ D QSL + I Q L + E E R
Sbjct 104 WIFGTTLDSKTQSLLIVNNATNVVIKVCEFQFCNDPFLGVYYHKNNKSWMESE--FRV-- 159
Query 443 ALPYSTVGNSN-NYLHLSVLRT-ELRPGETLNVNFLLRMDRAHEAKIRYYTYLIMNKGRL 500
YS N Y L E G N + KI Y N R
Sbjct 160 ---YSSANNCTFEYVSQPFLMDLEGKQGNFKNLREFVFKNIDGYFKI-YSKHTPINLVRD 215
Query 501 LKAGRQVREPGQDLVVLPLSITTDFIPSFR-LVA----YYTLIGASGQREVVADSVWVD 554
L G EP LV LP I I F L A Y T S A V
Sbjct 216 LPQGFSALEP---LVDLPIGIN---ITRFQTLLALHRSYLTPGDSSSGWTAGAAAYYVG 268
or just the last one:
Query 1549 LVKVQLSNDFDEYIMAIEQTIKSGSDEVQVGQQ 1581
LVK QLS +F I + I S D V+ Q
Sbjct 962 LVK-QLSSNFGA-ISSVLNDILSRLDKVEAEVQ 992
All this is ‘just’ an example of how similar this entire world is.., and yet, there are genetically modified species, still REAL HUMANS, and snakes!!! Jokes aside, there is indeed a huge issue with that complement human proteins in our blood system linked with coagulation and the severity of the ‘covid disease’. Here a short list of relevant references:
Hongbo Jiang et al. ”Association of Complement C3 with Clinical Deterioration Among Hospitalized Patients with COVID-19” Int J Gen Med. 2022; 15: 849–857.
Dimitrios C. Mastellos et al. “Complement C3 vs C5 inhibition in severe COVID-19: Early clinical findings reveal differential biological efficacy”. Clin Immunol. 2020 Nov; 220: 108598.
Published online 2020 Sep 19. doi: 10.1016/j.clim.2020.108598
Shilin Fang et al. “Decreased complement C3 levels are associated with poor prognosis in patients with COVID-19: A retrospective cohort study“ Int Immunopharmacol. 2020 Dec;89(Pt A):107070. doi: 10.1016/j.intimp.2020.107070. Epub 2020 Oct 5.
Anuja Java et al. “The complement system in COVID-19: friend and foe?.” JCI Insight. 2020 Aug 6; 5(15): e140711.
Published online 2020 Aug 6. doi: 10.1172/jci.insight.140711
Anastasia Polycarpou et al. “Rationale for targeting complement in COVID‐19”EMBO Mol Med. 2020 Aug 7; 12(8): e12642. Published online 2020 Jul 12. doi: 10.15252/emmm.202012642
B. Afzali et al. “The state of complement in COVID-19” Nature Reviews Immunology volume 22, pages 77–84 (2022)
Uniprot entry about complement: proteins of the complement system, a group of blood proteins of the globulin class involved in the lysis of foreign cells after they have been coated with antibody, and which also promote the removal of antibody-coated foreign particles by phagocytic cells. The pathway proceeds by a cascade reaction of successive binding and proteolytic cleavage of complement components. This pathway can be activated by either IgG or IgM binding to an antigen.
UNIPROT changed its format ‘just recently’